The internet real name system.

About real name system.

         Quality of the internet system is very high in Korea. Our everyday life has been comfortable due to the internet system. But people's the internet system consciousness is very low. People curse and are much violence in the internet. And they attack somebody by writing comments in the internet. Why do they attack them? I think that they don't have guilty conscience about attacking somebody and writing malicious comments in the internet because of not having responsibility. And the people's anonymity is guaranteed in the internet. Because of that, they write malicious comments or wrong information and attack somebody freely. So I think we need the internet real name system.

          First, Responsibility. people need to have responsibility in the internet. They don't have guilty conscience about attacking somebody and writing malicious comments or wrong information in the internet because their anonymity is guaranteed in the internet. If their anonymity is not guaranteed in the internet, do you think that they write malicious comments and attack somebody in the internet? My opinion is 'No'. I think they write malicious comments without guilty conscience because they aren't damaged by attacking somebody or by writing wrong information. So, We need the internet real name system.

          Second, the anonymity. They attack somebody because anonymity is guaranteed in the internet. So they write wrong information and attack somebody by using their anonymity. If the internet real name system disappear, malicious comments will be pile up. On the other hand, If the internet real name system is maintained, people will not write wrong information and attack someone in the internet. So We need to maintain the internet real name system.

          Anyone who claimed we need to remove the internet real name system say about data spill and freedom of expression. Corporations try to protect people's data and they must protect people's data. Protecting data is their duty. And freedom of expression accompanies responsibility to use the internet. But people think that freedom of expression is that they say their opinion freely. It isn't right. Saying opinion accompanies responsibility for expression. So, freedom of expression isn't to say opinion groundlessly. Freedom of expression will be guaranteed if people write comments reasonably. Also, if the internet real name system is maintained, people won't write wrong information and the cyber crime will decrease. So, I think we need to maintain the internet real name systems.

Social Commerce

About Social Commerce

   Since SNS(Social Network Service) appeared, The word 'Social' has been a popular word in Korea. And Social Commerce made an appearance in Korea. People liked the new shopping system and purchasing coupon of product at low price. And the social commerce provides people with many kinds of coupon from food to home appliances at low price. Do you think social commerce provides us with the good product at low price? My opinion is 'No' and that the social commerce has many problems.

   First, Profits. Coupons of restaurants which is sold by social commerce company have a limited use period. So the coupons should be used for a short time. Many consumers flock to restaurant for a limited use period. Restaurant are overloaded by many consumers for that period. Eventually, Both the consumer and the owners of restaurants are damaged. The consumers aren't satisfied with service and quality of food and the restaurants lose a reputation despite of low price because of a limited period. If you are a consumer of the restaurant, will you go to the restaurant again? Only the social commerce company get a great benefits. 

   Second, Verification. The social commerce company have ever sold the imitation product. This problem was a issue in the news. The social commerce company is a major company and it should check the a distribution process and a quality of a product before the product is sold. But it distributed the unauthenticated product to consumers. It was responsible for this situation.

   Also, social commerce company claims that it sells from 40% to 90% a discounted product. But the owners of the restaurants control the basic price of a  product for selling the coupon in the social commerce only. Although social commerce company sells discounted coupon of restaurant, the price of the coupon is not cheap because of the high basic price. And the owners of the restaurants target only a social commerce consumer.

The verification of social commerce is very weak.

  Sometimes the social commerce company sells good item at good price. The catching the good chance is a happy event. But I think people should not trust them completely and people should check carefully the information.

  Lastly, I have a question. What is the difference between a social commerce and a group purchase? I think a social commerce is a group purchase of a different sort. What do you think about that?

Power Blogger

About Power Blogger.

  To find any information, we use search engines of the portal site in the internet such as Naver, Google and Daum. Because all of the portal sites provide people with the blog, we can be easy to contact the blog during searching information. The bloggers supply people with good information which was direct experienced by the bloggers. So, people have received good information from them. The bloggers have power which can move people. People trust the bloggers now that they don't have any information. People are enthusiastic about the bloggers' information. But now we can't trust their information completely. Because the bloggers promote merchandises or restaurants after the they receive the money from sellers or owners. This is business. So, I think we need to restrict the blogger through the strong law.

  The bloggers earn much money without tax. Blogging is good job. The bloggers don't have to pay tax and they just enjoy taking photo and blogging with new merchandises and delicious foods. But they blog wrong information or lie. It is big problem. In that people trust them, people get the damage by using the bloggers' information. In case people accept the damage, the bloggers don't get the damage.

 (Ariticle ->http://www.todaykorea.co.kr/news/contents.php?idxno=161300)

Also, The sellers and owners through the blog don't take the damage and they don't refund people's money to consumers.

Those kinds of cases take place frequently. Therefore, we need ability to distinguish lie from the blog. Now our law of governing the blog is very weak. So, the blogger and sellers use its vulnerable point. Because If they pay a fine, the fine is smaller than their income.

So, I think we need to ability to distinguish lie from the blog and the law of governing the blog will be tightened.